A brief thought on the hijacking of ‘humane’


Jo-Anne McArthur / We Animals

When you look at this image, be honest. Is ‘humane’ the first word that pops into your head? I doubt it.

And then, if you’re like I used to be, you’ll find another internal dialogue begins.
‘But it must be humane, because there are laws; but it must be humane because the label says ‘free range’ or ‘organic’ or ‘XYPCA approved’, and we sigh with relief, switch off our concern and carry on demanding the flesh and the eggs and the milk.

Few of us think about this in any depth. It’s uncomfortable to see the images – the real ones, not the staged, cartoonish fantasy that we are sold as consumers. That’s why marketing doesn’t show the real stuff. Even so, if it wasn’t for the constant reassurance that it’s all ok, it’s all ‘humane’, we wouldn’t know what to think, would we?

And there’s the problem. Our understanding of the word ‘humane’ has been subtly hijacked. The meaning of ‘humane’ that is sold to us on the dismembered corpses of young creatures, on eggs and on the milk taken from the seeking mouths of babes, no longer means what we think that it means. How could it? How could the obtaining of ANY of the substances that we use and consume ever be truly ‘humane’? How could it be ‘humane’ when every single thing we do is unnecessary and so fraught with suffering and misery that we refuse to acknowledge the truth. We all find it much easier to hide behind the word ‘humane’, that redefined word that is now used as a marketing tool, as a conscience salve, as a legitimisation of a brutality that none of us wants to be part of.

We all know what ‘humane really means. It means ‘tenderness, compassion, and sympathy, especially for the suffering or distressed’. ‘Well here’s another word to throw into the mix; ‘humanity; the quality of being humane; kindness; benevolence’.

Not one single process that we inflict on the sentient individuals who are our wretched victims could ever be called ‘humane’ except through the hijacked and corrupted interpretation of the word that we have been sold as consumers.

Let’s take back the meaning of humane and in doing so, take back our humanity. The only way to do this is by being vegan.

Be vegan.

This entry was posted in Advocacy, Terminology and tagged , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

12 Responses to A brief thought on the hijacking of ‘humane’

  1. Pingback: ‘I think animals should be humanely treated’ | There's an Elephant in the Room blog

  2. Pingback: Heading in the direction of being vegan | There's an Elephant in the Room blog

  3. Pingback: Just another crank | There's an Elephant in the Room blog

  4. Pingback: Living in a land of make-believe | There's an Elephant in the Room blog

  5. Pingback: Claiming exceptions | There's an Elephant in the Room blog

  6. Pingback: Statistics: a list of individual tragedies | There's an Elephant in the Room blog

  7. Pingback: Cruelty to animals | There's an Elephant in the Room blog

  8. Pingback: The price of a life | There's an Elephant in the Room blog

  9. Shannon says:

    Of course. And thank you, Laura.


  10. Laura says:

    May I quote you!? Beautifully written ❤

    Liked by 1 person

  11. Shannon says:

    I completely agree with Spunky Bunny above. Exploitation of another — most certainly without that other’s consent — can ONLY result in inhumane. Cruelty wears many hats, and some of them look pretty.

    Liked by 3 people

  12. Spunky Bunny says:

    Basic decency demands that we be vegan.

    Liked by 3 people

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.